Home | About Us | Subscriptions | Advertising | El Centinela | ARCHIVES
Catholic Sentinel | Portland, OR Saturday, June 24, 2017

Marylhurst grad program May-August

Home : News : Local
11/30/2013 11:10:00 AM
Initiative aims to protect businesses over same-sex opposition
Sweet Cakes web page
Sweet Cakes web page

Oregonians troubled by the prospect of same-sex marriage want legal protection for business owners who refuse to serve gay weddings and civil union ceremonies. A group has filed a proposed ballot measure, saying it's meant to prevent shopkeepers from being force to violate religious beliefs.

The initiative comes after the state announced an investigation of Sweet Cakes, a Gresham bakery whose owners would not make a cake for a lesbian couple. Facing pressure and boycott,  Aaron and Melissa Klein have closed their shop, but operate online. They say the serve people who are homosexual, but don't want to take part in same-sex weddings because of their faith.

A group called Friends of Religious Freedom has formed to back the initiative.
“We are deeply concerned that even Oregon elected officials are becoming hostile towards religious freedom," says Teresa Harke, spokeswoman for the group.

She criticized Oregon Labor Commissioner Brad Avakian for saying that the goal is not to have business closed, but "rehabilitated."

"It is very troubling that Oregon elected officials believe people of faith or with conscientious objections need to be ‘rehabilitated,’” Harke says.

A 2007 Oregon law prohibits businesses from discriminating against customers on the basis of sexual orientation. With gay marriage becoming a possibility in the state, some photographers, caterers, and hotel owners are have misapprehensions.

The measure has not yet qualified for the ballot. Organizers will need to gather more than 87,000 signatures first.


Reader Comments

Posted: Saturday, November 30, 2013
Article comment by: Rolando Rodriguez, OFS

In response to the article about the Friends of Religious Freedom and the Oregon anti-discrimination laws (11/30/2013), I understand the moral dilemma they are dealing with and the affront caused by use of the word "rehabilitated."
I also remember all too well the days of signs that read, "We reserve the right to refuse service to anyone." Business owners then were also people of faith with conscientious objections. However, it was a question of civil law regulating civil activity, then and now. Discrimination is not a religious freedom. Otherwise, businesses could refuse to cater to Jews or Muslims or atheists or homosexuals, and maybe even certain races. Remember our national motto: E Pluribus, Unum.
Paz y Bien, Rolando, OFS.

Article Comment Submissions
Submit your comments, please. 
Comments are reviewed before being posted to the site. Comments must use respectful language and address the story. Comments are not posted immediately to the site. The site editor may edit content for appropriateness. There may be a delay of 24-48 hours. Comments may also be considered to appear as letters in our print edition, unless the writer specifices no.
Note: All information on this form is required. Your telephone number is for our use only, and will not be attached to your comment.
Submit an Article Comment
First Name:
Last Name:
Anti-SPAM Passcode Click here to see a new mix of characters.
This is an anti-SPAM device. It is not case sensitive.

Advanced Search

News | Viewpoints | Faith & Spirituality | Parish and School Life | Entertainment | Obituaries | Find Churches and Schools | About Us | Subscriptions | Advertising
E-Newsletter | RSS Feeds

© 2017 Catholic Sentinel, a service of Oregon Catholic Press

Software © 1998-2017 1up! Software, All Rights Reserved